From: utzoo!decvax!microsof!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!ariel!hou5f!npois!npoiv!houxm!houxz!hocda!spanky!burl!duke!unc!mcnc!idis!george
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Title: on the fate of net.misc
Article-I.D.: idis.204
Posted: Sat Apr 30 01:03:25 1983
Received: Mon May  2 05:57:30 1983

Upon thinking about the fate of "net.general",
an idea for "net.misc" occurred to me.

Some new groups, "net.misc.a", "net.misc.b", "net.misc.c",
could be created as arbitrary sub-groups to provide more
structure in grouping discussions that should be in "net.misc".
When someone posts an article on a new topic for net.misc,
they could choose a sub-group that seems to be least crowded.
Of course follow up articles would stay in the same sub-group.


	George Rosenberg
	idis!george