Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mcnc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!eagle!harpo!decvax!mcnc!akt
From: akt@mcnc.UUCP (Amit Thakur)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Smut and Free Speech
Message-ID: <2015@mcnc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Mar-84 00:59:23 EST
Article-I.D.: mcnc.2015
Posted: Mon Mar 26 00:59:23 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 27-Mar-84 01:01:25 EST
References: <1298@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: Microelectronics Ctr. of NC; RTP, NC
Lines: 10

consider the following:
if computer graphics technology were to advance to the point where
"life-like" movies could be created, (where one could not tell if
a real or computer-drawn person was on the silver screen), should
computer produced kiddie-porn be legal? right now the best argument
against kiddie-porn is that kids do not know enough to make 
uncoerced decisions about participation in pornographic movies.

akt at ...decvax!mcnc!akt