Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.12 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!liberte
From: liberte@uiucdcs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Some Questions - (nf)
Message-ID: <29200130@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 15-Apr-84 22:25:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.29200130
Posted: Sun Apr 15 22:25:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Apr-84 06:33:07 EST
References: <698@pyuxa.UUCP>
Lines: 22
Nf-ID: #R:pyuxa:-69800:uiucdcs:29200130:000:1004
Nf-From: uiucdcs!liberte    Apr 15 21:25:00 1984

#R:pyuxa:-69800:uiucdcs:29200130:000:1004
uiucdcs!liberte    Apr 15 21:25:00 1984

Being a peon, I am not in a position to know the true actions and motivations
of the world leaders as filtered through higher level peons.  I arrive at
generalizations which I feel are true - and this is a valid way to go.
(Is the chair you are sitting on solid?  Ask a physicist.  Is it really
there? Ask a philosopher.  Was Nixon a crook?  Ask a politicion.)

Regarding my indirect accusations of Nixons crimes:  All I did was to 
shift the emphasis away from a presumption of innocence because he was
NEVER convicted to a question of guilt because he might have been
CONVICTED had he been tried, and had more facts come out in the process.

I dont hold much stock in our injustice system, nor in the lethargislative
or execution branches of our government.  It was a good experiment, but
now we need to try something different.

Daniel LaLiberte,  U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Computer Science
{moderation in all things - including moderation}

BTW, the democrates arent doing a whole lot better.