Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxa!wetcw
From: wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP (T C Wheeler)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Richard Nixon  What LAW?
Message-ID: <720@pyuxa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 27-Apr-84 08:20:30 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxa.720
Posted: Fri Apr 27 08:20:30 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Apr-84 09:50:16 EST
References: <7375@decwrl.UUCP>, <715@pyuxa.UUCP>, <365@houxu.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 9

[]
Exactly how would you go about proving such a charge?  Since the tapes
(one) were not evidence at the time of the supposed tampering, but the
property of Mr. Nixon, how would you go about charging Nixon with
tampering with his own property which was not evidence?  Any court
would throw this one out.  Let's hear some more.  Be careful though,
separate the wishes and dreams from the reality of events.
T. C. Wheeler