Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pur-ee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-ee!kechkayl
From: kechkayl@ecn-ee.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: No willing Atheists? - (nf)
Message-ID: <1740@pur-ee.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Mar-84 04:18:49 EST
Article-I.D.: pur-ee.1740
Posted: Tue Mar 27 04:18:49 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Mar-84 01:37:59 EST
Sender: notes@pur-ee.UUCP
Organization: Electrical Engineering Department , Purdue University
Lines: 22

#R:ssc-vax:-1600:ecn-ee:18600009:000:688
ecn-ee!kechkayl    Mar 27 01:08:00 1984

[may the line-eater be with me]


 ->	>The burden of proof is on both the Theist AND the Atheist,

	Well, sorry to argue semantics, but I said *Non-Theist*. I don't 
believe in a god, and I don't believe there isn't a god. I am no authority 
on religious matters, therefore I don't feel qualified to tell others the
status of God. I simply don't feel that it is relevant to me. If you can 
convince me one way or another (providing you care :> ) I might change my ways.
Sorry if I step on any toes. You can believe anything you want, but don't
try to convince me unless you can produce sufficient evidence (NOT "faith");



				Thomas Ruschak
				pur-ee!kechkayl
				"Aiee! A toy robot!"