Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!jmike
From: jmike@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: Spock didnt have to die... - (nf)
Message-ID: <5400052@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 25-Apr-84 13:13:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uokvax.5400052
Posted: Wed Apr 25 13:13:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Apr-84 11:16:21 EST
References: <12421@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:sri-arpa:-1242100:uokvax:5400052:000:594
Nf-From: uokvax!jmike    Apr 25 12:13:00 1984

#R:sri-arpa:-1242100:uokvax:5400052:000:594
uokvax!jmike    Apr 25 12:13:00 1984

Well i thought of that too but shot it down with this explanation.  Since
sensors couldn't lock onto the Reliant (a massive object) they probably
couldn't lock onto anything smaller such as a person or bomb if that
person or bomb were in the nebula outside the Enterprise.  And you can't
use the transporter without locking onto the object.  Therefore that idea
doesn't work.  Now maybe you could've beamed aboard the reliant and
used its transporter but was it working?  Well they can't think of
everything...  That would make the movie too easy.

					mike stanley
					...ctvax!uokvax!jmike