Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!mhuxl!mhuxt!hstrop
From: hstrop@mhuxt.UUCP (trop)
Newsgroups: net.sport.hoops
Subject: Re: Shot Clocks
Message-ID: <1291@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 28-Mar-84 17:47:28 EST
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.1291
Posted: Wed Mar 28 17:47:28 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Mar-84 00:49:09 EST
References: <245@hou2b.UUCP>, <598@ihuxk.UUCP>, <904@drufl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 17

In regard to Darth Wombat's comment on the shot clock:

My own opinion is that the stall is destroying college ball.
Any team that relies on it deserves to lose. Two cases in
point within recent memory include Indiana and DePaul. They
got what they deserved. Not only does the stall rob the fan
of seeing real basketball, it has a tendency to break a team's
offensive concentration. I am firmly in favor of passing games,
provided there is a reason for the pass. Anyone who saw the
exciting first round games between Northeastern and VCU and
Virginia and Iona knows what I mean. Those were basketball
games!

		The preceding opinions are my own and therefore
		represent absolute truth :-)
				Harvey S. Trop
				mhuxt!hstrop