Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cornell.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!wally From: wally@cornell.UUCP (Wally Dietrich) Newsgroups: net.taxes Subject: Re: Tax Bracket Question - (nf) Message-ID: <7308@cornell.UUCP> Date: Wed, 4-Apr-84 17:03:10 EST Article-I.D.: cornell.7308 Posted: Wed Apr 4 17:03:10 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Apr-84 02:04:59 EST References: <2876@fortune.UUCP>, <289@charm.UUCP>, <7196@cornell.UUCP>, <155@homxa.UUCP> Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept. Lines: 39 [] FLAME ON! > > Please look at the instructions for line 38, form 1040. One can either > > use the tax tables (which are discrete) or one of the tax schedules X, > > Y, or Z (which are continuous) to compute your tax. > > Nope. The instructions for line 38 say you must use the (continuous) > schedules if your income is $50,000 or more or you use income > averaging. They then say: > > "If none of the above conditions apply to you, you MUST use the > Tax Table to find your tax." > > So while it's true that added income that pushes you into a higher > tax bracket still leaves you better off in general, the fact that > the Tax Tables round your income to the nearest $50 introduces > discontinuities. > ... > > --Bruce Burger AT&T-Information Systems Lincroft, NJ Thank you Bruce for helping me point out the falacies in the arguments of mam@charm.UUCP (Matthew Marcus), wjm@whuxj.UUCP (MITCHELL), dys@homxa.UUCP (D.SIZE), dougs@tekecs.UUCP, and btb@hogpc.UUCP (B.BURGER). I am constantly amazed by the amount of incorrect information on the net. It just goes to show that you should never believe what you see here. Fortunately, it is easy to find solution to this problem, all you have to do is look at the instructions for line 38 in the 1040 form. Flame off. To Matthew, MITCHEL, ...: Someday I will be in the %50,000+ income category too, but until then I guess I'll have to put up with a discontinuous tax rate! Wally Dietrich