Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.11 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!roy
From: roy@uiucdcs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: IBM 9002 and Xenix ? - (nf)
Message-ID: <13700051@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Apr-84 18:18:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.13700051
Posted: Mon Apr  9 18:18:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Apr-84 07:32:56 EST
References: <120@hsi.UUCP>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:hsi:-12000:uiucdcs:13700051:000:395
Nf-From: uiucdcs!roy    Apr  9 17:18:00 1984

#R:hsi:-12000:uiucdcs:13700051:000:395
uiucdcs!roy    Apr  9 17:18:00 1984

In case anyone was wondering, I meant to have deleted the tail of the 
response about CS9000s.  The information is not "confidential". (Especially
not now it is on the network!).  We had to wait until IBM announced a
delivery date for the system before we could talk about it...
Also, the text on the benchmarks comes from Columbia, we just added the
CS9000 figures.
Sorry about the messy note.