Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site basser.SUN
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!decvax!mulga!munnari!basser!kvm
From: kvm@basser.SUN (Karlos Mauvtaque)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards, net.lang.c
Subject: Re: (***f)(): PCC bug or legal C?
Message-ID: <270@basser.SUN>
Date: Thu, 19-Apr-84 13:16:30 EST
Article-I.D.: basser.270
Posted: Thu Apr 19 13:16:30 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Apr-84 01:43:45 EST
References: <264@basser.SUN>, <454@wjh12.UUCP>
Organization: Dept of C.S., University of Sydney
Lines: 5

It is simply wrong.  No amount of fast foot-work about what the reference
manual might have said in the (your?) best of possible worlds can change
this.  My point (which I hope wasn't missed by everyone) was that saying
"X is legal C because some reportedly-standard compiler accepts it"
is ridiculous.