Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!saquigley
From: saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re Abortion - Men's Rights
Message-ID: <7414@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Mar-84 12:45:44 EST
Article-I.D.: watmath.7414
Posted: Fri Mar 30 12:45:44 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Mar-84 07:18:34 EST
References: <370@csin.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 19



I believe that when a man has sex, he has made an implicit contract to
give away all his rights to the sperm that he puts in the woman's body.
After all he did leave the sperm in her body didn't he?

Just joking, folks.  This is just to point out the idiocy of "implicit"
contracts.  You can make them do or say anything that suits you without
having to provide any proof.  If people start using "implicit" contracts
against women to further their aims, we can start using implicit contracts
against them to further ours.  Fair's fair.

So as I said before, this argument of "implicit" contracts is just plain
crappy.

	

				Sophie Quigley
			...!{decvax,allegra}!watmath!saquigley