Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxu!martillo
From: martillo@ihuxu.UUCP (Yehoyaqim Shemtob Martillo)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Martillo's Rape Cure
Message-ID: <278@ihuxu.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Apr-84 23:37:02 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxu.278
Posted: Wed Apr  4 23:37:02 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Apr-84 02:17:36 EST
References: <6976@unc.UUCP>, <368@ihuxt.UUCP>, <343@ccieng5.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 37

This debate has twisted and turned long enough.

My original article was a reply to Brownmiller's contention that men
oppress women through rape.

I contend the oppression is probably an unconcious side-effect and in fact
men can oppress women in a society where rape is almost impossible.

Despite all the net doubters there is less rape in Islamic society.

Women can either be raped by strangers or non-strangers.

In traditional Islamic society women are always guarded by their male
relatives.

If a stranger simply tries to talk to a woman, he runs the risk of severe
bodily harm from her relatives.

If a male relative wants to rape a woman, he cannot because the Islamic
family is an extended hamula type family.  There is no privacy.  Family
member rape really only becomes possible in nuclear and near-nuclear
family.

All the ideological debate on rape is really peripheral.

The questions are:

	How is rape to be discouraged?
	
	How is the accused rapist to be tried?
	
	How is the convicted rapist to be punished?
	
I am willing to stop flaming on this topic if everyone else is.

I am only posting this article to net.women.