Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!mit-eddie!rh
From: rh@mit-eddie.UUCP (Randy Haskins)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: To be a father unwittingly
Message-ID: <1622@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Apr-84 03:34:01 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1622
Posted: Mon Apr 16 03:34:01 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Apr-84 07:18:35 EST
References: <6375@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 14

At first, I said, "Hell, no, nothing wrong with that."  But then,
after a while, I started thinking of the metaphysical consequences
of this sort of thing (those of you who don't believe in such
things, stop here).  It seems that the child would have some of the
father's character in her character, and it might affect him in some
way which he will be unable to understand.  Of course, the concept
of having sex with someone without determining the status of birth
control is totally alien to me (actually, I can think of a couple of
wierd situations in my life, but they're not relevant to the topic
here...), so maybe he got what he deserved.  I know that I, for my
part, could not do what she did without telling the other person
involved, even if he didn't ask.
-- 
Randwulf  (Randy Haskins);  Path= genrad!mit-eddie!rh