Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site deepthot.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!deepthot!julian From: julian@deepthot.UUCP (Julian Davies) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: sexism in language Message-ID: <293@deepthot.UUCP> Date: Mon, 16-Apr-84 13:24:34 EST Article-I.D.: deepthot.293 Posted: Mon Apr 16 13:24:34 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 17-Apr-84 19:09:06 EST References: <62@mako.UUCP> Organization: UWO CS, London Canada Lines: 31 --------------- Many words have multiple meanings. "Man" means either an adult male or the human species. Like other homonyms, one must judge by context which meaning applies. That is part of our language understanding abilities. Yes, undertones of maleness do come in, but I don't believe this is due to terminology, but rather it stems from the fact that we live in a male dominated world. I believe that if we were in a female dominated world with the same language and terminology, then the male undertones would be replaced by female undertones. Similarly, if you change the terminology in the world as it is today, the undertones of maleness would remain. In other words, these masculine undertones are not a product of our language, but of our society. Changing the language would be a very shallow and meaningless victory, although on the surface it might appear pleasing, it would not solve anything. ------------------ I cannot fully agree with you there. The word man is what some philosophers and linguists call "pseudo-generic" because it is used for two different classes, one of which is a proper subset of the other. Doubtless the fact that "man" etc are used in this way can be traced back to male domination in society, and doubtless some tendency to male dominance may continue after the language has moved on, but neither is a justification for continuing with a usage which is at best potentially misleading. Since there are many contexts for the word "man" etc in which the wider or the narrower meaning could legitimately be taken, the effect is inevitably to infect the wider meaning with traces of the narrower (male) meaning. Julian Davies uwo!julian