Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!peterr From: peterr@utcsrgv.UUCP (Peter Rowley) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: But words can sometimes hurt you Message-ID: <4002@utcsrgv.UUCP> Date: Sat, 21-Apr-84 05:05:45 EST Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.4002 Posted: Sat Apr 21 05:05:45 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Apr-84 09:47:34 EST Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto Lines: 33 >I have always been surprised by those who define 'liberty' as the freedom >to have OTHER PEOPLE BEHAVE IN THE WAY ONE PREFERS. My liberty is often achieved at the expense of yours. My continued well- being depends on your being constrained not to kill me, for example. A psychological question arises: can someone's liberty (i.e. freedom of action) be restricted simply by being called something? If I organize everyone around you to call you "stupid" at every possible opportunity, I will not have done any physical violence to you, but your self-image may well be damaged to the point of you being severely restricted in your ability to live your life. Advertising which depicts women in stereotyped situations (the infamous laundry detergent commercials, for example) is a milder example. Porno- graphy has begun to be treated in this manner, as a civil rights (i.e. liberty) issue (ref. the recent attempt at a city by-law in Minneapolis on this basis). The pen is mightier than the sword, right? The sword is much more controlled than the pen right now-- with the only exceptions being the slander, libel, and (in Canada) hate literature laws. These laws restrict freedom of expression, for good reason-- to preserve the liberty of others. I would expect to see a few more, very specific, laws much like the hate literature laws to tackle the worst sorts of pornography. This article is long enough. Words, including titles, can restrict someone's liberty. They can fight it, of course, but, like it or not, we are influenced by our dealings with others. Legal remedies would be hard to write and enforce, yes-- but the lack of a legal solution doesn't mean there isn't a problem. p. rowley, U. Toronto