Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcla!hpfclq!robert
From: robert@hpfclq.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.ai
Subject: Re: A topic for discussion, phil/ai pers
Message-ID: <68500002@hpfclq.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-May-84 10:12:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfclq.68500002
Posted: Wed May  9 10:12:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 22-May-84 07:47:08 EDT
References: <277@wxlvax.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Fort Collins Systems Division - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:wxlvax:-27700:hpfclq:68500002:000:843
Nf-From: hpfclq!robert    May 18 09:12:00 1984

I don't see much difference between preception over time and preception
at all.  Example: given a program understands what a chair is, you give
the program a chair it has never seen before.  It can answer yes or no
whether the object is a chair.  It might be wrong.  Now we give the
program designed to recognize people examples of an Abraham Lincoln
at different ages  (with time).  We present a picture of Abraham
Lincoln that the program has never seen before and ask is this
Abe.  The program might again answer incorectly but from a global
aspect the problem is the same.  Objects with time are just classes
of objects.  Not that the problem is not difficult as you have said,
I just think it is all the same difficult problem.

I hope I understood your problem.  Trying hard,
					Robert (animal) Heckendorn
					..!hplabs!hpfcla!robert