Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 4/2/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houxe!drutx!opus
From: opus@drutx.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: RE: Why Not Virtual Files? - (nf)
Message-ID: <286@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-May-84 11:08:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.286
Posted: Thu May 10 11:08:37 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 07:51:00 EDT
References: <2572@ncsu.UUCP> <3200003@uicsg.UUCP> <866@eosp1.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 11

> > Wouldn't you expect the system to save its core before it goes down?

> Generally speaking this feature disappeared when physical memory
> stopped being real "core" and became some form of dynamic RAM - many
> moons ago.

It did?  Then what's on those tapes the operators make when one of
our systems crashes?  (Hint:  it's not chopped liver.)

Jim Shankland
..!ihnp4!druxy!opus