Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utastro.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!ethan From: ethan@utastro.UUCP (Ethan Vishniac) Newsgroups: net.astro.expert Subject: nemesis and the end of the world Message-ID: <16@utastro.UUCP> Date: Wed, 23-May-84 11:24:13 EDT Article-I.D.: utastro.16 Posted: Wed May 23 11:24:13 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 31-May-84 19:21:06 EDT Organization: UTexas Astronomy Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 56 [Insert your message here] I'm going to be off the net for a few months (spending the summer in sunny Santa Barbara). I thought I'd toss one more article into the mill before my departure. There has been a recent proposal that our sun has a companion star. Naturally such a star must be inconspicuous and therefore small and dark. The motivation is as follows: Mass extinctions tend to occur with a definite periodicity of about 26 million years. This is a claim advanced by someone at U. Chicago (sorry, I can't remember the name) who is a reputable paleontologist. Besides the evidence for a large meteoritic impact close to the time of dinosaur extinctions there is also an analysis of the ages of large terrestrial impact craters which shows that the ages of the craters tend to cluster around the times of the mass extinctions. The number of craters involved in the analysis is small. The claim is that the 26m year periodicity in extinctions is at least 260 million years old. There does not seem to be any periodicity within the solar system which could account for such a long period. Estimates of intervals between comet impacts give roughly similar numbers, but one would expect that process to be randomly distributed in time, not periodic. Therefore if all this is true (no opinion from this onlooker) we need to invoke an astronomical source of periodicity. The easiest way to do this is to suppose that every 26m years something disturbs the Oort cloud ( a region about 10,000 AU from the sun where comets come from). Normally the stuff there just goes about its own business, never getting very close to the inner solar system (where we live). Every now and then a passing star disturbs the cloud and a few comets come our way (and some, presumably, decamp for the great beyond). If something really shook up the Oort cloud then a whole lot of comets would come at once, and some of them would rain debris down on us (and on the other planets and moons). There are two ways to do this periodically. One is to suppose that this has something to do with our orbit through the galaxy. As it happens, every 26m years we pass through the galactic disk (our sun bobs up and down as it circles the galaxy). Since this is just the right period that would seem to be it. However, *right now* we are passing through the disk, and we are about midway between extinctions. It seems that this periodicity is about 180 degrees out of phase with the extinctions. Since the density of perturbing material is highest in the disk it's hard to imagine why it should be dangerous to be *away* from the disk. The second idea (which is the one that's gotten a lot of press recently) is to imagine that the sun has a companion on a 26m year orbit. At perihelion (closest to the sun) it lies in the Oort cloud and kicks up some dust. The rest of the time it is thoroughly insignificant. The main problem is the one that Randy Haskins pointed out. Such an orbit is too large to be particularly stable. If the periodicity really goes back 260 million years then this explanation appears unlikely. Passing stars should constantly perturb the orbit. The period wouldn't be regular. The star should miss the Oort cloud every now and then, or even be expelled from our vicinity. This leaves us without any good explanations for the extinctions. Maybe, every 26m years the elves come out and sterilize the planet. "Only perverts use cute signoffs" Ethan Vishniac {ut-sally,ut-ngp,charm}!utastro!ethan