Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: nyu notesfiles V1.1 4/1/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!floyd!cmcl2!acf4!sullivan
From: sullivan@acf4.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Record Cleaners - Don't use LAST
Message-ID: <8800002@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Apr-84 03:26:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.8800002
Posted: Tue Apr 17 03:26:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 1-May-84 19:06:58 EDT
References: <207@whuxj.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:whuxj:-20700:acf4:8800002:000:711


Nf-From: acf4!sullivan    Apr 30 17:26:00 1984


I think the statement "Don't use LAST" is a bit too strong.

Sure, avoid it as long as you can on normal records (if they sound good with
just some simple cleaning from the typical products like DiscWasher). But if
you have a record that you think you are going to have to throw away because
it is dirty enough to become a sandbox for the neighborhood kids, then by
all means give this stuff a try!  I have brought a few records back to life
with LAST, and to me that makes the investment in LAST worthwhile.  Of course,
whether or not they will last another 10 years is another matter--I'll get
back to you in 1994 and let you know.

David J. Sullivan, WA1TNS		...floyd!cmcl2!acf4!sullivan
New York University