Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!mit-eddie!zzz
From: zzz@mit-eddie.UUCP (Mike Konopik)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Record Cleaners - Don't use LAST
Message-ID: <1723@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-May-84 11:44:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1723
Posted: Wed May  2 11:44:41 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 4-May-84 00:41:41 EDT
References: <207@whuxj.UUCP> <8800002@acf4.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 9

I've used both DiscWasher and LAST. I much prefer the latter -- I have
had rather impressive results with both new and old/dirty records. I only
wish they didn't make us use that G*ddam eyedropper to go from preservative
bottle to applicator. But that's only a minor gripe as far as I'm concerned.
-- 

				-Mike

genrad!mit-eddie!zzz  (UUCP)    ZZZ%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC  (ARPA)