Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site proper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!intelca!proper!gam
From: gam@proper.UUCP (Gordon Moffett)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.music,net.audio,net.misc
Subject: Re: Re: Request for net.music.classical news group
Message-ID: <1181@proper.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-May-84 03:34:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: proper.1181
Posted: Wed May  2 03:34:21 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 4-May-84 01:27:53 EDT
References: <639@ihuxn.UUCP>, <515@ucbvax.UUCP>, <518@ucbvax.UUCP>, <521@ucbvax.UUCP>
Organization: Proper UNIX, Oakland, CA
Lines: 17

#
So where is this plethora of classical music articles demanding
their own newsgroup to call home?

This argument always generates more articles than the newsgroup
would seem to have.

Oh, and of course it brings out that cultural snobbery of "Oh,
dear, we couldn't POSSIBLY post articles about OUR kind of music
in that icky, rock-filled net.music."  Why not?  net.music is
`filled' with articles about Rock and Punk by default, because
YOU (yes, you, right there behind the asparagus fern) didn't
bother to post any about music you like.

Well, it has worked before.  People have had quite interesting
discussions on classical music in net.music.  I see no reason
why this cannot continue.