Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site felix.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!celerity!bmcg!felix!roger From: roger@felix.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Who is Liable?? Message-ID: <253@felix.UUCP> Date: Wed, 2-May-84 09:13:43 EDT Article-I.D.: felix.253 Posted: Wed May 2 09:13:43 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 5-May-84 00:54:25 EDT References: <2729@alice.UUCP>, <220@drutx.UUCP> Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, Ca. Lines: 42 [] Regarding the Mark Donohue case ..... As several of you have stated, race drivers generally assume the risks involved in racing area fairly high, especially at the level at which Donohue was driving. Donohue himself is on record as having stated to his own press agent the following if he ever had a fatal crash: "If the engine failed, don't blame the engine, blame me for revving the engine too much." "If the car fails, blame me for going off the track." "And if the tire fails, blame me for going over a curb or hitting a curb." His press agent then asked, "Suppose you're coming down a straightaway and a tire blows, how can I say you hit a curb or hit debris?" He said Donohue replied: "The risk of tire failure or equipment failure is one of the risks we drivers assume. Even if the tire is defective, we assume that risk." The above quotes are from the April 30, 1984 issue of AutoWeek (reprinted without permission, of course). This is an excellent source for information about the trial, though it might be just a bit one-sided in its opinions. By the way, the above exchange was ruled as inadmissible as it was "Prejudicial and irrelevant," and was never heard by the jury in the Donohue case. Goodyear is confident that they will win on appeal. So confident in fact, that although they felt they might lose the trial, they went ahead, rather than settle for 5.6 Million out-of-court. Roger Webster