Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekig.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig!david
From: david@tekig.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: AIR SHOCKS - PRO OR CON?
Message-ID: <2011@tekig.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-May-84 11:36:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekig.2011
Posted: Wed May  9 11:36:11 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 08:21:27 EDT
References: <2184@ihuxf.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 18



Maybe I'm missing something with air shocks.....


How does the shock act like a constant rate spring if
they themselves are supporting weight?  Don't you
lose the "shock absorbing action"?

I had a pair on an early Mustang, they did raise the
rear a tad, and they also made it ride like a rock.

Could someone enlighten this ignorant soul.


tektronix!tekig!david