Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site intelca.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!intelca!cem
From: cem@intelca.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors - (nf)
Message-ID: <272@intelca.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 24-May-84 14:52:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: intelca.272
Posted: Thu May 24 14:52:46 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 31-May-84 19:48:37 EDT
References: <2800015@uicsl.UUCP> <368@ihu1g.UUCP>
Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 14

I recently got a set of schematics for a radar detector/jammer. The
box not only detects radar but "fools" the other radar into believing
you are going slower than you really are. For instance, it can be set
55, to always make the other radar read 55 regardless of your speed
or to xx% say 75% and you are going 75 the other radar will "clock"
you doing 57.25. Now for the question, is this interfereing with 
justice and the collection of evidence ? Why does a civil authority
have the right to operate radar equipment and I don't ? Actually
I havent built this gizmo since it is fairly expensive (like $1500)
Wonder what the legal implications are, is there any case law on this
that we know of?

			--Chuck