Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!floyd!cmcl2!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!brad
From: brad@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.comics
Subject: re: Forge's gun & Marvel Science vs. DC Science
Message-ID: <7000@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-May-84 14:51:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.7000
Posted: Thu May 10 14:51:10 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 12:11:59 EDT
References: <17@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 15

Ok, ok.  So maybe neither DC nor Marvel is particularly good at doing
the science, and maybe Gerry Conway is the least accurate writer in
existance, but I still have the gut feeling that overall, the average DC
comic has better science than the average Marvel.

The only reason that the Handbook of the Marvel Universe even sounds
good is that Mark Gruenwald cares.  For more ideas on both scentific
information and on continuity, try finding an issue of Omniverse (there
are 2 issues in existance).  This magazine, written by Mark Gruenwald,
is terrific, especially for anyone who loves explanations and continuity.  

			b**2
		arpa	brad@maryland
		csnet	brad@umcp-cs
		uucp	{seismo,allegra}!umcp-cs!brad