Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sdccs6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdccs6!ix21
From: ix21@sdccs6.UUCP (David Whiteman)
Newsgroups: net.consumers
Subject: ATT Calling Cards [liability if lost or stolen]
Message-ID: <1442@sdccs6.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Apr-84 06:36:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdccs6.1442
Posted: Sun Apr 29 06:36:37 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 1-May-84 07:18:29 EDT
Organization: UCSD Medical School
Lines: 14
Keywords: Also submitted to TELECOM digest (fa.telecom)

It was announced Thursday [4/26/84] that the FTC and the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank are holding hearings to
determine whether the ATT calling card treated as a credit card for
the purposes of determining liability in the event of a lost or
stolen card.

Currently there is no regulation limiting the liability of a
consumer for unauthorized use of a Calling Card.  If such a
regulation is passed the consumer would only be liable for the
first $50.  An ATT spokesman said there was no reason for such a
regulation because ATT has never billed a customer for a charge from
a lost or stolen card.  A government spokesman then said ATT has
nothing to worry about.