Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site trsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!trsvax!mikey
From: mikey@trsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.consumers
Subject: Re: Consumer "Lifestyle" Questionnaire - (nf)
Message-ID: <70900006@trsvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-May-84 14:09:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: trsvax.70900006
Posted: Wed May 16 14:09:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 19-May-84 00:44:47 EDT
References: <7740@decwrl.UUCP>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:decwrl:-774000:trsvax:70900006:000:968
Nf-From: trsvax!mikey    May 16 13:09:00 1984

#R:decwrl:-774000:trsvax:70900006:000:968
trsvax!mikey    May 16 13:09:00 1984


You didn't state whether the survey required your name, address, and blood 
type.  I don't think it was that bad, if you didn't like it, don't answer it.

I've known groups who in the past depended on the "Stanford Test".  If it 
was the same thing, it's probably legit.  Supposedly, these test are much
more accurate at predicting behavior, honesty, and performance for potential
employees than a polygraph, and although you may not know, are much less
offensive.  (Maybe Mystic was disguising a job offer!!!)

Seriously, maybe the company was trying to get a much more detailed 
feeling of their customers and was doing serious market research.  Personally,
I think they should mail a letter requesting you to take the survey or even
not send part two until you sent the first part in.  And then of course,
you may have already won $100,000!!! To find out, just complete the enclosed 
application!!!

BTW, how do you know of the Bondage Emporium?

mikey at trsvax