Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!decvax!decwrl!chabot@amber.DEC
From: chabot@amber.DEC (Lisa Chabot)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: suggestions for those lacking a cute signoff
Message-ID: <280@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-May-84 16:40:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.280
Posted: Thu May 17 16:40:10 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 18-May-84 07:28:02 EDT
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 16

My suggestion for a cute signoff is a quote from a letter by ...loral!hlb 

>	this is a test

Of course, if that's what loral!hlb was suggesting by that letter,
than I guess I can't suggest the same thing.

Since this is net.flame, I guess I'd better include a flame:

	Doesn't this REALLY belong in net.wanted!!!!!   :-)

	Lisa S. Chabot 

UUCP:	...{ decvax | allegra | ucbvax }!decwrl!rhea!amber!chabot
USFail:    DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlboro, MA  01752
shadow:	...{ decvax | allegra | ucbvax }!decwrl!rhea!avalon!chabot