Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site plx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!sun!plx!jk
From: jk@plx.UUCP (jk)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Fraudulent use of AT&T Calling Cards (nf)
Message-ID: <142@plx.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 26-May-84 16:24:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: plx.142
Posted: Sat May 26 16:24:36 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jun-84 21:10:54 EDT
Organization: Plexus Computers, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 13

Dave Wallis writes:

>Just because something is obvious doesn't mean it's feasible! Anyway,
>why do you care? AT&T has never required anyone to pay for long
>distance calls they didn't make - AT&T eats the loss.

While the rest of your comments make sense who do you think
you are kidding with this one?!?!? You can't fool me.....I
know my phone bills HAVE to go up as AT&T "eats" these losses.

				No cute signoff yet..
				John Kullmann (Plexus Computers Inc)
				..!decvax!sun!plx!jk