Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830713); site log-hb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!mcvax!enea!log-hb!hans
From: hans@log-hb.UUCP (Hans Albertsson)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Censorship: A Case History (part 1, 11 Jan 84 to 23 Jan 84)
Message-ID: <159@log-hb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-May-84 00:00:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: log-hb.159
Posted: Wed May 23 00:00:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 23-May-84 08:04:13 EDT
References: <7200@unc.UUCP> <100@ut-sally.UUCP>, <1841@mit-eddie.UUCP>, <1103@qubix.UUCP> <761@pyuxa.UUCP> <591@Re: Censorship: A Case History (part 1, 11 Jan 84 to 23 Jan 84)
Organization: TeleLOGIC Nyn{shamn SWEDEN
Lines: 23

[Chompsky Syntax Spec]
	A point missed is that "Rights to retain a privilege" are relative,
	meaning in this case:
	
	Tim ( and a lot of others at UNC ) have access to a network
	communication service motivated by their work.
	As an added bonus, private and other spurious out{put,bursts} are
	allowed or tolerated. This right must be considered to be granted
	to all of those involved, and no selective censorship should be
	tolerated. If one ( or more ) abuse their privileges in such a
	manner that those footing the bills are disenchanted enough to want
	to revoke the privileges, then so be it! But for ALL involved.
	If Tim, and Tim alone, is being censored, on whatever grounds, then
	that is very undemocratic, and an infringement of his "free speech"
	rights. 

-- 
			{decvax,philabs}!mcvax!enea!log-hb!hans
			Hans Albertsson, 
			TeleLOGIC AB
			Box 1001,
			S-14901 Nynashamn,
			SWEDEN