Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site qubix.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!qubix!steven From: steven@qubix.UUCP (Steven Maurer) Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: On unc!tim: You don't *know* that! Message-ID: <1143@qubix.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-May-84 10:50:01 EDT Article-I.D.: qubix.1143 Posted: Tue May 29 10:50:01 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jun-84 07:27:45 EDT References: <600@osu-dbs.UUCP>, <1129@qubix.UUCP>, <771@pyuxa.UUCP> Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA Lines: 74 [**] >> Steve's ramblings sound just like a sound made by a bloated >> horse relieving itself from it's non-eating end. To match >> his phrasing, it was a bunch of commie-pinko raving. He >> seems to like to call anything he disagrees with facist. I'm >> sure he would not know a fascist from a football if one >> goosestepped over his nose. In typical left wing fashion, >> he refuses to weigh the evidence. Instead, he leaps to >> unfounded conclusions based on nothing more than some >> ephereal notion of "rights". I seem to have offended your sensibilities, by quoting the current interpretation the bill of rights, and calling restrictions on freedom of speach and press, "fascist". Pardon me, perhaps I should have said "totalitarian". I myself, grieve at the right wing's continuing belief that liberty and freedom are a result of "commie-pinko" thinking. This is assuredly not the case, although I will admit that I would rather be a pesant in the USSR, than I would in El Salvador. >> "RIGHTS? You ain't got no rights, you got privledges. If >> you abuse those privledges, you ain't got them either, as >> long as I'm paying your salary." This is essentially how >> it works out here in the real world. A publically funded university is hardly "the real world", as others have already noted. A university is funded by the government, and therefore must follow the same restrictions that the government does. While you are correct that a private institution does not have to follow the Bill of Rights or the Constitution, (private schools can teach relegion, for example), it does not follow that a public institution has the same right to restrict freedoms. >> Folks better get the idea that this net is a god given >> right out of their heads, it ain't. If you want a free >> wheeling, no holds barred net, you better start one >> yourself. I feel sure that if the leftys did, they would >> immediatly bar any comment from the right. They have done >> this kind of thing before in the media, so why would a >> net be any different? I am not a "lefty", and would not bar anyone from saying anything. I am a centerist. However, if your rather abusive comments are any example of what you consider "comment from the right", I can see why you are dissatisfied with the current state of the media. (As a side note, a leftist friend of mine accuses the US press of not telling the Sandinista side of the story -- refusing to publish all but the reagan administrations point of view on the matter). >> Finaly, Steve, calling everything you disagree with a facist plot, >> is just plain dumb. Why not try to see the other side of >> a story before jumping into the flames. >> If there are to be flames about this article, please move them >> to net.flames where we can be more verbose and vicious. I prefer the cooler atmosphere of net.followup, and refuse to participate in juvinile name calling. By the way, I call nothing a "plot", you made that from whole cloth yourself. I only point out that certain ideas are simply older, debunked, ideas rewritten to appear more palatable. Steven Maurer