Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: nyu notesfiles V1.1 4/1/84; site acf4.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!acf4!tihor From: tihor@acf4.UUCP Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Message-ID: <11100005@acf4.UUCP> Date: Wed, 23-May-84 23:33:00 EDT Article-I.D.: acf4.11100005 Posted: Wed May 23 23:33:00 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Jun-84 11:43:40 EDT References: <425@hogpc.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #R:hogpc:-42500:acf4:11100005:000:861 Nf-From: acf4!tihor May 31 23:33:00 1984 >> Oh well, so much for UNIX as a standard. It's amazing how AT&T got up >> at the keynote speach at UNIFORUM and said things like Vendor Independence >> and Standardization, only to go around constantly contradicting these >> fine ideals. >I don't see how not supplying everything in section 1 of the UNIX User's >Manual means that UNIX isn't a standard anymore. Heck, V6 was the last >UNIX that had a nice compact manual; and 4.xBSD and USG UNIX now have >rather elephantine sections 1. But it does mean that the most minimal UNIX System V release 2 that AT&T sells is all that one can depend on. The Kernel is there but a lot of "The Unix Way" is using the tools to build stuff. The tools that one cna depend on are now more limited. Maybe anyhow, it depends on what intersection of V7, USG 3, and BSD 4.x one was using as the standard before.)