Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site emory.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!emory!kim
From: kim@emory.UUCP (Kim Wallen {Psychology})
Newsgroups: net.info-terms
Subject: Re: Anyone have experience with Qume terminals?
Message-ID: <1352@emory.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-May-84 09:54:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: emory.1352
Posted: Tue May 22 09:54:33 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 23-May-84 19:07:08 EDT
References: <714@ucbvax.UUCP>, <156@callan.UUCP>
Organization: Math & Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta
Lines: 14

In response to !callan!geoff.  If you use a QVT-103 instead of a
QVT-102 you get full Ansi-3.64 compatibility.  I have finally
written a termcap for the QVT-103 and find it a truly excellent
terminal.  In reverse video it has the easiest to read display of
any terminal I have used.  

I agree that the keyboard is a weakness, although not as bad as
Geoff would suggest.  One of my students is a touch typist with a
soft touch and she has trouble with  jamming keys.  I only use
about five fingers and have no trouble.  Keep in mind that a QVT-103
with amber screen (highly recommended) can be had for $800 and you have
a vt-100 compatible terminal.

akgua!emory!kim