Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uiucuxc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!hamilton
From: hamilton@uiucuxc.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: return expr and Decus-C - (nf)
Message-ID: <21000012@uiucuxc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-May-84 15:39:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucuxc.21000012
Posted: Wed May 16 15:39:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 18-May-84 00:37:44 EDT
References: <478@decvax.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:decvax:-47800:uiucuxc:21000012:000:155
Nf-From: uiucuxc!hamilton    May 16 14:39:00 1984

#R:decvax:-47800:uiucuxc:21000012:000:155
uiucuxc!hamilton    May 16 14:39:00 1984

i prefer
    return (expr);

why shouldn't a function un-call resemble a function call?  i've never
gone hunting for a function named "return" by mistake.