Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!bmcg!cepu!trwrba!trwrb!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!ctc From: ctc@ccivax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.legal Subject: Re: On possessing more than one driver's license Message-ID: <134@ccivax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 4-May-84 11:14:35 EDT Article-I.D.: ccivax.134 Posted: Fri May 4 11:14:35 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 8-May-84 07:08:57 EDT References: <398@houxt.UUCP> <1722@mit-eddie.UUCP> Organization: CCI Telephony Systems Group, Roch, NY Lines: 6 If as mit-eddie!lenoil says the only answer is to have all 50 states share licensing data, which of you will be the first to your terminal to flame about invasion of privacy? Also under our constitution I am not sure that this type of data sharing is either legal or wise. If you start at driver licensing data where does it end.