Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcla!ajs
From: ajs@hpfcla.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: suggestion for rmail
Message-ID: <17200004@hpfcla.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Apr-84 13:37:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfcla.17200004
Posted: Thu Apr 19 13:37:00 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 21-May-84 06:03:08 EDT
References: <606@pyuxqq.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Fort Collins Systems Division - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:pyuxqq:-60600:hpfcla:17200004:000:423
Nf-From: hpfcla!ajs    Apr 14 19:37:00 1984

> A simple and cheaper solution would be to inform a user who sent mail via
> an inefficient route of that fact and suggest a POSSIBLE set of alternates.

Of course, if I purposely choose to use a certain path, I don't want a lot
of junk mail razzing me about it.  So, I guess we'll need a new header
line like "Stupid-path-on-purpose: yes".  :-)

Alan "two problems for every solution and a cpu on every desk" Silverstein