Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!fortune!rpw3
From: rpw3@fortune.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re: what to do with (as yet) illegal dom - (nf)
Message-ID: <3358@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-May-84 04:04:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: fortune.3358
Posted: Sat May 19 04:04:47 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 20-May-84 00:12:26 EDT
Sender: notes@fortune.UUCP
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 26

#R:wisc-cry:1297456416:fortune:28400003:000:716
fortune!rpw3    May 18 21:17:00 1984

+---------------
| ...We intend to munge it to something like EITHER
| 
| (1) <@WISCVM.ARPA:USER@BNETHOST.BITNET>
| (yes, I guess with some noise before the "<"), OR
| (2) USER%BNETHOST.BITNET@WISCVM.ARPA
| 
| ...Does anybody have any opinions about this?  Would anybody mind if
| a source-route has an unknown domain in other than the first position?
+---------------

Having just composed a long ramble in "net.mail" on quoting, I wonder why
the following would not be both legal and preferred:

  (3) "USER@BNETHOST.BITNET"@WISCVM.ARPA


Rob Warnock

UUCP:	{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd70,hpda,harpo,sri-unix,allegra}!fortune!rpw3
DDD:	(415)595-8444
USPS:	Fortune Systems Corp, 101 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065