Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site spuxll.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!drutx!houxe!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!floyd!whuxle!spuxll!ech
From: ech@spuxll.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.puzzle,net.math
Subject: Re: Three Inverter Problem
Message-ID: <480@spuxll.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-May-84 01:49:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: spuxll.480
Posted: Tue May 29 01:49:13 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jun-84 22:02:29 EDT
References: <426@trwspp.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, South Plainfield NJ
Lines: 6

An interesting followup to this problem (typical of candidacy questions!) is:
Can one conclude that NO circuit need contain more than two inverters?
(Since we can make three from two, why not use two of those to make three,
etc.?)

=Ned=