Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxj.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!ihuxj!gek From: gek@ihuxj.UUCP (glenn kapetansky) Newsgroups: net.med Subject: Re: Surgery to Correct Vision Message-ID: <483@ihuxj.UUCP> Date: Mon, 30-Apr-84 20:01:11 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxj.483 Posted: Mon Apr 30 20:01:11 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 1-May-84 19:03:40 EDT References: <107@loral.UUCP>, <616@ariel.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 28 OK, I posted an answer to this question months ago, and I feel obligated to do so again. Keratotomies (sp?) are DANGEROUS! The Russians first promulgated the technique, using 15 or more slashes in their typically crude way. They didn't do any long term studies, no followup, CERTAINLY no report of failures. American doctors picked up the technique, and now use far fewer slashes (down to 8, last I heard). This is important, because the cornea is pulled into its new shape by the scar tissue in these (radial) cuts. But scar tissue isn't transparent, so incident light can be refracted by the scars internally across the entire cornea. This means that drivers at night will suffer flashes across their entire field of vision due to oncoming headlights. Ycch, I say. I LIKE to drive at night! Hmmm. So you say maybe it's still worth it, if it works, to finally be rid of your glasses. Sorry. You see, the correction is unpredictable. I (with my 20/800 vision) may get to 20/200, you (with your 20/200) may only get to 20/100. Or I may end up better than you. For a while, that is. Because, my son (says my father, who's a specialist in matters ocular), after about 10 years the cornea tends to revert to its original shape. This leaves you with poor vision AND scars. Double ycch! -- glenn kapetansky "If I only had a brain" ...ihnp4!ihu1j!gek