Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!sri-unix!GZ@Mit-Mc.ARPA From: GZ@Mit-Mc.ARPA Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: More on Software policy Message-ID: <12200@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Wed, 11-Apr-84 08:43:00 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.12200 Posted: Wed Apr 11 08:43:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 9-May-84 23:48:32 EDT Lines: 30 From: Gail Zacharias Date: 6 Apr 84 10:49:36-PST (Fri) From: decvax!mcnc!ecsvax!dmimi at Ucb-Vax.ARPA ... It is evident that pirating software IS stealing ... People keep saying this. It is not at all evident to me. It is clear that it is illegal to make copies of copyrighted material beyond the fair use provisions, but the law is not the final authority on morality. In this case, the author does not lose anything he had, he only loses POTENTIAL profit. That potential exists *only* because the copyright laws grant it, so if you are discussing the morality of copyright laws, that particular argument is circular. The main argument for copyright protection seems to be that if it wasn't there, nobody would bother writing anything, since they couldn't make enough off of it beyond the one initial sale. That may be true, but I don't see any significant moral force behind that sort of reasoning. It doesn't hold for almost any other profession you can think of, e.g. construction workers don't make any money for the use of buildings they build, they only get paid for the initial labor. Scientific (as opposed to engineering) discoveries get no legal protection at all. This is considered highly beneficial to the progress of science (i.e. "standing on the shoulders of giants"). It is entirely feasible that if copyright protection for software didn't exists, some other kind of economic scheme would develop, most likely around maintenance and distribution of software, handholding and other consulting services and so on. In the mean time, society would benefit since instead of writing still another Pascal compiler from scratch, you could take an existing one and make it better instead, causing real progress instead of the constant re-inventing of the wheel so prevalent in the software industry today.