Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site amd70.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!amd70!phil From: phil@amd70.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: 80286 benchmarks and other Intel libel Message-ID: <4635@amd70.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-May-84 15:21:33 EDT Article-I.D.: amd70.4635 Posted: Thu May 10 15:21:33 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 08:19:42 EDT References: <380@sri-arpa.UUCP> Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA Lines: 13 > From: Ricky Ewing > There never was a DEC-20? What does that mean? How does it relate to your > argument for Intel? The referenced article was in response to an article by someone out of DEC complaining that the 432 had been cancelled. I thought that was hypocritical since DEC has killed their 36 bit computer line in favor of the VAX line. I claim that a company has a right to stop doing anything that's unprofitable for them. Sorry if I was being too subtle. I'm not arguing so much for Intel as I am for rational arguments. -- Phil Ngai (408) 749-5286 {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amd70!phil