Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!ntt
From: ntt@dciem.UUCP (Mark Brader)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.micro,net.legal
Subject: Re: Computer Bulletin Board Confiscated
Message-ID: <941@dciem.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-May-84 18:54:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: dciem.941
Posted: Mon May 28 18:54:07 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 29-May-84 12:48:39 EDT
References: <806@sdcsvax.UUCP> <5815@mcvax.UUCP>, <1941@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: NTT Systems Inc., Toronto, Canada
Lines: 12

Randwulf (mit-eddie!rh) writes:
	                                 ... how would you like it if on
	one of them your home address and the type of lock on your front
	door (including techniques for breaking same) appeared?  Someone
	should be held responsible for the BBoard....

I say, someone should be held responsible for the ITEM ... the person who
posted it, of course.  However, I suppose many of them allow anonymous
posting (I haven't used one myself).  In that case it does seem fair to
make the BB administrator responsible since it was their decision to allow it.

Mark Brader