Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site amd70.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!amd70!phil
From: phil@amd70.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: PAL 32R16
Message-ID: <4689@amd70.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 31-May-84 03:37:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: amd70.4689
Posted: Thu May 31 03:37:06 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Jun-84 08:28:47 EDT
References: <3808@tekecs.UUCP>
Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 14

I told you I might be biased in my last article.

Actually, I have built complicated multi-PAL circuits and do appreciate
the savings inherent in having everything in one package. It is my
personal opinion that the 32R16's savings are cancelled by the large
package size and high cost at this time.

Sorry if there were misunderstandings about what was personal opinion.
Most of what I say on this net is just my opinion. (maybe I should
have one of those stupid "cute" signoffs disclaiming responsibility
for everything including whether the sun will rise in the morning)

-- 
Phil Ngai (408) 749-5286 {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amd70!phil