Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1e.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihu1e!nowlin From: nowlin@ihu1e.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.apple,net.micro.cpm Subject: Flipping Floppies Message-ID: <257@ihu1e.UUCP> Date: Wed, 23-May-84 13:56:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ihu1e.257 Posted: Wed May 23 13:56:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 25-May-84 01:02:47 EDT Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 33 I recently got my update to Aztec C (Version 1.06B). One of the disks had a bad side, but they're going to send me a new one right away. They distributed this version on two double sided disks that have to be turned over on my Apple. Besides Manx I've also purchased Microzine from Scholastic Software and Graphics Magician from Penguin Software in this form. That brings me to a question. Have you ever cut a WP notch in the off edge of a floppy and turned it over to use the other side? I tried this for backing up Penguin's Graphics Magician. I just used an Exacto knife I had laying around and measured the spot with a ruler. It worked just great as far as I can tell. Then I read an article about why turning over disks is not a good practice. According to the article, when the disk spins in the opposite direction dirt drops out on the disk instead of being picked up by the jacket liner. Is this a real matter for concern? If it is then why do companies like Manx, Penguin, and Scholastic distribute their software on floppies that have to flipped over? Even if the disks they use are certified for double sided use, they still spin in opposite directions when you turn the disk over to use the other side. They might rationalize that you will back your new software up right away and never use the original disks enough for this to be a problem. That can't Scholastic's reasoning since their stuff is protected. If this is truly a problem, and not just propaganda written by some disk manufacturer, would Scholastic be responsible for a disk drive head problem since their disks could contribute to the failure? Anyone have any thoughts on this topic? Jerry Nowlin ihnp4!ihu1e!nowlin