Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dartvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!decvax!dartvax!johnc
From: johnc@dartvax.UUCP (John Cabell)
Newsgroups: net.micro.trs-80
Subject: Tandy 2000 benchmarks
Message-ID: <1405@dartvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Apr-84 21:17:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: dartvax.1405
Posted: Mon Apr 30 21:17:22 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 1-May-84 19:23:44 EDT
Organization: Dartmouth College
Lines: 14


  Just becuse the benchmarks were tested with the same basic
does not necessarily mean that they are the same and the comp-
uter is the only variable.
  Most basics, even though named the same, are not the same.
they have the same name (same company), but have to be dif-
ferent because the inside of the machines are different.
If they were all the same, they would be the same machines
too.
  what I think that these benchmarks show is that the tandy
2000 is a very good, sophisticated machine that isn't just
IBM compatable, but surpasses IBM.  I'M glad tandy finally
came out with a fantastic machine like this.
             --johnc
             (decvax, cornell)!dartvax!johnc