Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!perelgut
From: perelgut@utcsrgv.UUCP (Stephen Perelgut)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.misc
Subject: Re: Censorship: A Case History
Message-ID: <4272@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-May-84 10:07:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.4272
Posted: Mon May 14 10:07:25 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 14-May-84 10:26:34 EDT
Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto
Lines: 26

<>

If it comes down to a net.vote, I vote against unc!tim.  His
posting proves that he:
	1) Violated an agreement by purposefully misreading the
	   intent.  When he posted to unix-wizards
	2) Violated an agreement by getting a friend to post for
	   him.  [I like the response.  Boot the "friend" off!]
	3) Violated an agreement by mailing outside the local
	   environment to beg for help.
Any employee who does all that should be fired.

As for "it doesn't cost anything" arguments, what about the
sites outside the local area who have to transmit the mail and
news around the world.

Finally, anyone childish enough to vent his dirty laudry on the
network deserves what he gets.  

I hope that any company that is thinking of hiring Tim takes into
account his record (including the 240K of whining drivel.)
-- 
Stephen Perelgut   
	    Computer Systems Research Group    University of Toronto
	    Usenet:	{linus, ihnp4, allegra, decvax, floyd}!utcsrgv!perelgut
	    CSNET:	perelgut@Toronto