Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site heurikon.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!uwvax!heurikon!jeff
From: jeff@heurikon.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.flame
Subject: Re: Tim Maroney
Message-ID: <260@heurikon.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 20-May-84 23:37:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: heurikon.260
Posted: Sun May 20 23:37:50 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 26-May-84 09:49:33 EDT
References: <266@uwvax.ARPA>
Organization: Heurikon Corp., Madison WI
Lines: 19

> Those who are not aware of the documentation of this incident of censorship
> should read net.sources, which has the full transcript of the electronic
> messages associated with the incident.
Sorry, not so.  There were some things in section 4 or 5 which weren't in
net.sources.  For example, did anybody else notice this:

Tim's only comment within the articles regards the dates of one of
Brooks' last messages and the dates of the two previous messages.
Tim infers that Brooks was pulling a fast one by implying that he
had just been informed of Tim's unauthorized postings when the
informant's messages were actually dated many days before.  Well,
those two previous messages were not addressed to Brooks, so they
say nothing about when or how Brooks made his decision.  Anyway,
what does it matter exactly how much time elapses between messages?
We're only seeing the electronic mail, not the total picture.
-- 
/"""\	Jeffrey Mattox, Heurikon Corp, Madison, WI
|O.O|	{harpo, hao, philabs}!seismo!uwvax!heurikon!jeff  (news & mail)
\_=_/				     ihnp4!heurikon!jeff  (mail - fast)