Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Very Short SPINAL TAP review - (nf)
Message-ID: <643@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 8-May-84 16:43:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.643
Posted: Tue May  8 16:43:42 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 9-May-84 02:38:08 EDT
References: <1331@uw-june.UUCP> <10000046@uiuccsb.UUCP> <139@iwpba.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 11

Most people I've run into who didn't like Spinal Tap didn't like it
precisely because it hit too close to home ("Hey, man, like rock music
isn't like that, man, I mean, like they're making fun of like, artists,
man...")

Needless to say, this has made me want to see it even more. (Haven't yet...)
Most reviews from a wide variety of people have been favorable.
-- 
"An argument is an intellectual process.  It isn't the automatic gainsaying of
	what the other person says."
"... Can be."					Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr