Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!jab
From: jab@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Re: Roll-your-own SF Films - (nf)
Message-ID: <3900029@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-May-84 21:08:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uokvax.3900029
Posted: Tue May 15 21:08:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 18-May-84 01:43:49 EDT
References: <966@druxt.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:druxt:-96600:uokvax:3900029:000:554
Nf-From: uokvax!jab    May 15 20:08:00 1984

#R:druxt:-96600:uokvax:3900029:000:554
uokvax!jab    May 15 20:08:00 1984

/***** uokvax:net.movies / druxt!mcq /  7:46 pm  May  8, 1984 */

One of the mistakes movie makers seem to make, at least in my opinion,
is attempting to do movie versions of LONG novels and series of novels.
Most of the novels I've really liked would NOT make good movies.  Oh well.

			Bob McQueer
			ihnp4!druxt!mcq
/* ---------- */

But gee, there have been SO MANY good ones. There was "Lord of the Rings,"
"Excalibur," and all the "Tarzan" movies. (The last two weren't from one book,
but sorta fall into that class also.)

	Jeff Bowles
	Lisle, IL