Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uicsl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uicsl!wombat
From: wombat@uicsl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Hitch in "Harry" - (nf)
Message-ID: <7600052@uicsl.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-May-84 14:42:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uicsl.7600052
Posted: Sat May 19 14:42:00 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 21-May-84 04:19:13 EDT
References: <1467@zehntel.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:zehntel:-146700:uicsl:7600052:000:576
Nf-From: uicsl!wombat    May 19 13:42:00 1984

#R:zehntel:-146700:uicsl:7600052:000:576
uicsl!wombat    May 19 13:42:00 1984

In that case, where does Hitchcock appear (if at all) in *Rope*?

Just saw this one last weekend, and I'd rank the three I've seen
so far as *Rear Window*, *Rope*, and *Vertigo*. *Vertigo* was a real
disappointment for me: I'd been hearing for years how great it was,
but the second half just didn't seem to  work, and the ending was
silly. *Rear Window* was great, good characters, nice suspense,
neat set -- something I'll definitely go see again some day.
*Rope* also had a nice feel to it. Looking forward to the other two.
						Wombat
						ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!wombat